Symposium: The Business Model of Product and Process Assurance
-------------- ---(half-day)
Leaders: Jairus Hihn, Tim Menzies, Yuko Miyamoto, Haruka Nakao, Dan
-------------Port
*** new ***
Position Papers Posted Here
*******
There is little doubt on the necessity and value of assurance
activities such as software quality assurance (SQA), verification and
validation (V&V), and capability maturity (CM). However, as with
any business activity, assurance incurs cost, a cost for which a
healthy return on investment is expected. At least the activity needs
to prove cost-effective. There have been very few attempts to assess
the relative cost-effectiveness of the broad range of technology
product and process assurance methods empirically. This raises a number
of important technology management questions including:
* What is the “right” amount of assurance to perform?
* How can the benefit of assurance be measured and assessed?
* Is it more cost-effective to perform assurance on a per-project
basis, or as an institutionalized effort balanced applied across an
organization?
* Measuring the impact of process improvement?
* Improving software quality through effective use of metrics
* How do you create an effective measurement program?
* What is the business case for assurance?
* How can the quality of assurance be assured?
* What is the balance of effort of assurance and effort of the other activities?
* How do the domain specific factors affect the benefit and the effort of assurance?
* What should we do for verification and validation for software software product?
* How do we know the quality of the assurance activity?
We seek position papers on the following suggested topics:
* Determining appropriate amount of assurance
* ROI for assurance
* Assessing value of assurance
* Automated versus non-automated quality metrics collection
* Economics of assurance
* Validation of assurance methods
* Cost-effectiveness of assurance techniques
* Business case for assurance
* Interplay of assurance and risk management
* A ssurance Metrics
* Certification of assurance
* Certification of assurance practitioners
* Assurance cost and effort estimation
* Assurance standards
* Management of assurance
* Dealing with uncertainty in assurance assessments
* Use and abuse of historical data
* Need and rationale for assurance
* Training of assurance personal
* Model driven assurance
Each designated participant agrees to bring a "working paper" of ideas,
arguments, tools, software, case studies, etc. - anything that
contributes to the explanation, development, and articulation of the
topic. This can be as long as a regular paper (10 pages), but not
shorter than 5 printed pages. Ideally, these papers are prepared in
advance, to be posted on the conference website to be examined by
participants before the conference. Since not everyone has access to
the web during the conference, each designated participant should bring
at least a dozen paper copies.
Please submit papers for this symposium to dport@hawaii.edu.
Submissions will be reviewed by organizers for relevance to
symposia audience. Authors of accepted papers will be expected to
provide brief background presentations (10 mins) on their positions to
facilitate later discussion. The working session will focus on
addressing positions and produce a monograph containing the collected
position papers, presentations, and symposium commentary from the
participants. This monograph will be posted on the HICSS web site http://www.hicss.hawaii.edu/Reports.htm
Jairus Hihn ( jhihn@jpl.nasa.gov )
is a Principal Member of the Engineering staff at NASA's Jet Propulsion
Laboratory and is currently the manager for the Software Quality
Improvement Projects Measurement Estimation and Analysis Element, which
is establishing a laboratory wide software metrics and software
estimation program at JPL. MEsA's objective is to enable the emergence
of a quantitative software management culture at JPL. He has a PhD in
Economics from the University of Maryland. He has been developing
estimation models and providing software and mission level cost
estimation support to JPL's Deep Space Network and flight projects
since 1988. Dr. Hihn has extensive experience in simulation and Monte
Carlo methods with applications in the areas of decision analysis,
institutional change, R&D project selection cost modeling, and
process models.
Tim Menzies (tim@menzies.us )
is Associate Professor at the Lane Department of Computer Science at
the University of West Virginia (USA), and has been working with NASA
on software quality issues since 1998. His recent research concerns
modeling and learning with a particular focus on light-weight modeling
methods. His doctoral research aimed at improving the validation of
possibly inconsistent, knowledge-based systems in the QMOD
specification language. He also has worked as an object-oriented
consultant in industry and has authored over 150 publications and
served on numerous conference and workshop programs and well as guest
editor of journal special issues.
Yuko Miyamoto (miyamoto.yuko@jaxa.jp ) is with the Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA).
Haruka Nakao (harukanakao@yahoo.co.jp)
is with the Japan Manned Space Systems Corporation (JAMSSS). Her main
empirical research areas include Strategic COTS IV&V for real space
project and Strategic and Economic Methods for Assessment for IV&V
activities.
Dan Port ( dport@hawaii.edu )
is an Associate Professor of Information Technology Management at the
University of Hawaii's Shidler College of Business and a Visiting
Associate at the Center for Software and Systems Engineering at the
University of Southern California. His research focuses on strategic
planning and assessment of software assurance activities, strategic
software engineering, empirical software engineering, and software
engineering education. Daniel attended UCLA and graduated with a degree
in Mathematics and later received his Ph.D. in Applied Mathematics and
Theoretical Computer Science from Massachusetts Institute of
Technology. He does not own any aloha shirts.