Workshop:
Ethical Research and Design in Cyberspace (Half-day Workshop)
Leaders: Robert Mason, Elizabeth
Buchanan and
Alpha DeLap
Research on information systems and information behavior in today’s
environment increasingly involves collecting data using online approaches
and from online sources. As technologies and information behaviors change,
researchers must adapt their research methods to the new opportunities and
research needs. Previous research models, and the rules used to assure
ethical research, may be inadequate in this new environment. Most of us
have found that local institutional review boards (IRBs) also are
challenged by these new research opportunities and seek to be more
responsive to researchers’ needs while simultaneously protecting human
subjects and the interests of the institutions they represent.
This workshop combines theory and case discussions to develop new
approaches to ethical decision-making in designing and conducting research
in (and on) online communities, virtual worlds, the “blogsphere,” and
similar settings. Workshop participants will have the opportunity to
discuss their own cases to explore possible alternatives to current
rule-based decision methods.
We will comprise a brief review of different conceptual frameworks for
making ethical decisions in research and systems design, from the
traditional deontological and utililitarian approaches to more recent
suggestions for process- and discourse-based methods. Multiple scenarios
and cases will be used to illustrate and discuss the difficulties that
face researchers—and the institutional review boards (IRBs) of
universities—as they seek to resolve the issues presented by research
proposals examining new phenomena.
Examples of such issues include:
-
Does research on blog content constitute
human subject research? (Are blogs public or private?) Do we apply the
same rules to research on blogs as we would to research on newspaper
articles?
-
How should an IRB view a proposed research
plan that includes joining an online community for the purpose of doing
research on this community? (Or should the researcher even be required to
notify the IRB of this plan?) Does this change if the online community is
in a virtual world (e.g., Second Life) instead of a listserv and
text-based group?
Robert Mason
(rmmason@u.washington.edu),
Professor and Associate Dean for Research at the University
of Washington’s Information School, was organizer and co-chair of the
HICSS 42 minitrack on ethical issues and is serving in the same role for
the minitrack for HICSS 43. His research interests include cultural issues
in information science and knowledge management and the ethical dimension
of information systems research and design.
Elizabeth Buchanan
(eliz1679@uwm.edu)
is Associate Professor and Director, Center for Information
Policy Research, School of Information Studies, University of
Wisconsin-Milwaukee. She was the recipient of two National Science
Foundation grants to study IRBs and their reviews of Internet-based
research; she sits on the IRB of the Medical College of Wisconsin, and has
been the chair and/or organizer of many professional conference sessions
on Internet research ethics. She is currently Chair, Association of
Internet Researchers Ethics Working Group and Co-Director, International
Society for Ethics and Information Technology.
Alpha DeLap
(adelap@u.washington.edu) is the
Director of Research Services at the Information School of the University
of Washington (UW). In this capacity, she works to nurture, promote and
guide faculty and student researchers. Her current research interests
focus on the ethics of on-line research, and she serves on one of the UW
Institutional Review Board’s committees and reviews human subjects
applications. Prior to moving to Seattle, Dr. DeLap taught communication,
composition and gender and media studies courses in Colorado and
Massachusetts. Her doctorate is in communication (University of
Massachusetts at Amherst, 2003).