Track:
Software Technology
Minitrack:
The Business Model of Product and
Process
Assurance
There is little doubt on the necessity and value of assurance
activities such as software quality assurance (SQA), verification
and validation (V&V), and capability maturity (CM). However, as
with any business activity, assurance incurs cost, a cost for
which a healthy return on investment is expected. At least the
activity needs to prove cost-effective. There have been very few
attempts to assess the relative cost-effectiveness of the broad
range of technology product and process assurance methods
empirically. This raises a number of important technology
management questions including:
-
What is the “right” amount of assurance to perform?
-
How can the benefit of assurance be measured and
assessed?
-
Is it more cost-effective to perform assurance on a
per-project basis, or as an institutionalized effort balanced applied
across an organization?
-
Measuring the impact of process improvement?
-
Improving software quality through effective use of
metrics
-
How do you create an effective measurement program?
-
What is the business case for assurance?
-
How can the quality of assurance be assured?
-
What is the balance of effort of assurance and
effort of the other activities?
-
How do the domain specific factors affect the
benefit and the effort of assurance?
-
What should we do for verification and validation
for software product?
-
How do we know the quality of the assurance
activity?
Suggested Paper Subjects
-
Determining appropriate amount of assurance
-
ROI for assurance
-
Assessing value of assurance
-
Automated versus non-automated quality metrics
collection
-
Economics of assurance
-
Validation of assurance methods
-
Cost-effectiveness of assurance techniques
-
Business case for assurance
-
Interplay of assurance and risk management
-
Assurance Metrics
-
Certification of assurance
-
Certification of assurance practitioners
-
Assurance cost and effort estimation
-
Assurance standards
-
Management of assurance
-
Dealing with uncertainty in assurance assessments
-
Use and abuse of historical data
-
Need and rationale for assurance
-
Training of assurance personal
-
Model driven assurance
Minitrack Co-chairs:
Dan Port (Primary)
Shidler College of Business
Information Technology Management Dept
University of Hawaii at Manoa
Email: dport@hawaii.edu
Jairus Hihn
NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Email:
jhihn@jpl.nasa.gov
Tim Menzies
Department of Computer Science
University of West Virginia
Email: tim@menzies.us
Yuko Miyamoto
Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA).
Email: miyamoto.yuko@jaxa.jp
Haruka Nakao
Japan Manned Space Systems Corporation (JAMSSS)
Email: harukanakao@yahoo.co.jp